Opened 6 days ago

#15032 assigned defect

Let's look at the advantages and disadvantages of rental and built-in disk file site

Reported by: anonymous Owned by:
Priority: major Milestone: Commissioning
Component: Zeus Core Version: 2.0
Severity: medium Keywords:


Let's look at the advantages and disadvantages of rental and built-in webhard.

Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This identifies something that shares idc's server resources with other users.

Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

The rental type gets the benefit of having a server on idc, so it does not have to be managed separately, and the original setting cost is low.

However, you must pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.

There are disadvantages such as for example dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.

Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

It has the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not just a Webhard, it is a company.

It is because it really is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.

Link hard solutions have emerged based on the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden.

It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the solution alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the desired pc, NAS, and server equipment. If you already had a website or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work which used to run the site.

OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.

By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the company's homepage and also the Webhard's original function, the thought of developing a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the perfect solution is.

The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, that can be fully built in Soho, so the parts which were agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.

It is now necessary for Soho to establish a web hard system.

Rental vs. Construction.

Webhard reminds you of a very useful and convenient Online sites that allows you to download files over the Internet at a fixed monthly cost. Which means that the use of web hard has become common.

But it's not just recently that this concept arrived, and it's true that it's been a long time. When it came out, many people used it, and there have been many workers in offices who didn't join it or even paid for their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and you can find probably still some now.

The biggest background of the phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as work used, while there are many burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses based on limited capacity. In addition, the service is provided contrary to the backdrop of a big portal, which also results in security concerns about the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company refuses to adopt it.

In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses based on the number of users), which is prohibitive in comparison to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.

NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anybody with significantly decrease the needs of these webhard users. Webhard is very innovative because it supports uploading files automagically. It's a really good feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside and never have to buy an authorized IP.

Unfortunately, you can find functional limitations because the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. As the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. Due to this fact, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Of course, it is a paid option, but it's a very low-cost, very useful solution that's significantly less than a tenth of the cost of building a single server.

Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low priced, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll check out the rough top features of Webhard and guide you. It is possible to go over it and choose the best one based on the reality and needs.

Attachments (0)

Change History (0)

Modify Ticket

Change Properties
Set your email in Preferences
as assigned The ticket will remain with no owner.
as The resolution will be set. Next status will be 'closed'.
to The owner will be changed from (none) to the specified user. Next status will be 'new'.

Add Comment

E-mail address and name can be saved in the Preferences.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.