donwload site

[anonymous]

Webhard

When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud should be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.

Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.

Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as the next cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It has a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.

In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

When compared to next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for a few selected sound sources. Another cloud only has to be in a folder.

You need to share a URL and that means you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, there exists a saying that N drive appears like an area drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, which is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks on them. It's much better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.*

It is extremely specialized in playing music. In particular, it's the only cloud that may play sound sources within an environment much like MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play up to 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often cut off at that point)

It has a large capacity. This can be a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services all together, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, if a picture is contained in a document, it is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And if you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you're in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. And when it's in that state, you should find the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Except for those points, you'll find nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.

It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you focus on can continue being reflected in the cloud instantly. It is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to connect to other Google services such as Gmail.

Unless you upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file will not account for cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just use the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos could be played right away. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.

There are probably the most apps which might be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a small pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it is a block after a lot of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.

If you use Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it's the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and use MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude compared to office programs applied to computers.Is it obvious?)

Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a certain amount of buffering time for each photo). However, if you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify before start of playback. It's the best in the world in terms of media reading.

There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.

The speed is relatively good. It's a lot faster than the Box and doesn't work with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit that could be uploaded from a free account may be the largest. 300MB.

​https://www.asiadisk.com The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.

The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity is the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...

There is a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected instantly when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself can't be documented.

There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. To be able to work on a document, you can choose the interface you want through the app drive and work on it leisurely.

In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can be flipped over the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.

File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to share data conveniently with little use of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's even worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on some type of computer than pay attention to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).

It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a little slow.*

Skydrive

The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to say that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.